Darren Aronofsky's Black Swan
Auteur Analysis
As crazy as I am about films I thought I'd let you guys in on how i perceived them. I saw Darren Aronofsky's Black Swan all over again. The thing with watching films over and over again is that one gets to notice all those little details that one tends to ignore on the first watch. Here I have analyzed if Darren Aronofsky is the auteur for the film.
As crazy as I am about films I thought I'd let you guys in on how i perceived them. I saw Darren Aronofsky's Black Swan all over again. The thing with watching films over and over again is that one gets to notice all those little details that one tends to ignore on the first watch. Here I have analyzed if Darren Aronofsky is the auteur for the film.
Translated from the French, auteur simply means "author". There have been varied perceptions regarding this theory, its importance and effectiveness. Auteur theory is essentially “a method of evaluating films based on the director’s involvement and input”. The concept of ‘Auteur’ was first introduced by François Truffaut in 1954 in A Certain Tendency in French Cinema. In this work he claimed that film is a great medium for expressing the personal ideas of the director. He suggested that this meant that the director should therefore be regarded as an auteur. According to him, there are three forms in which a director may be regarded as an Auteur. He agreed with André Basin’s idea that the film must be the direct expression of the director’s vision. The second aspect was that the director must be skilled with the camera. He believed the director is to camera as the writer is to pen. Lastly he believed for a director to be considered as an Auteur, he must leave behind a distinctive signature (based on Alexander Astruc’s idea), visually or as an idea in the film. Years later, this concept was reintroduced by Andrew Sarris in 1962, in a publication titled “Notes on Auteur theory” . Accordingly, for a director to be considered as an auteur, the director must be well versed with the technical aspects of the film. The director must have a distinct style or a signature that distinguishes his films from the others. The movies must have a theme, an inner meaning.
Shortly after leaving CHAM!, Mima receives an anonymous fax
calling her a traitor. Mima finds a website called "Mima's Room" that
has public diary discussing her life in great detail. She confides in her
manager Rumi Hidaka, a former pop star herself, about the site, however, she is
advised to just ignore it. Othe set of Double Bind, Mima succeeds
in getting a larger part. The producers have agreed to give her a leading role,
however as a rape victim in a strip club. Despite Rumi’s warning that it would
ruin her reputation, Mima accepts the part voluntarily. Though it is apparent
that Mima is indecisive, the atmosphere of the scene traumatizes her so that
she increasingly becomes unable to separate reality from fantasy. She can no
longer distinguish her real life from her work. She becomes paranoid. Consequently people who had been
involved in tarnishing Mima’s reputation are murdered and Mima finds evidence
which makes her appear as the prime suspect. Her increasing mental instability
makes her doubt her own innocence. It turns out that the diarist of
"Mima's Room" is delusional and very manipulative, and that an
intense folie à deux has been in play. The faux diarist (and
murderer) believes that she is Mima who is forever young and graceful, has made
a scapegoat of stalker Me-Mania.
Mima knocks Me-Mania unconscious with a hammer
when he attempts to rape her, and runs to her only support she has left alive,
her manager Rumi. When Mima encounters Rumi, however, her manager is wearing a
replica of Mima's CHAM! Costume and crazily singing Mima's pop songs. Rumi is
in fact the false diarist, who believes she is the "real Mima". Rumi
is angry that Mima has been ruining the "real Mima's" reputation, and
decides to save "Mima's" pristine pop idol image through the same
means she has been using all along: murder. Mima manages to incapacitate Rumi
after a chase through the city despite being wounded. Rumi remains permanently
delusional and institutionalized. Mima has grown from her experiences and has
moved on with her life with new found independence and confidence.One finds a
striking similarity between the two storylines, if one were to imagine Mima as
the White Swan – the pure innocent Nina Sayers, and Rumi as the Black Swan –
the violent, sensual and dangerous psychosis of Nina. There are too many
similarities between the storylines. In both cases, during the fight between
the two characters (For the sake of this argument, let us assume the black swan
and white swan as separate.) The antihero of the story attacks the protagonist.
In both cases the protagonist is wounded in the abdomen (almost in the same
area – above the liver). In both cases, the protagonist continues their bidding
after being wounded. Nina finishes the dance while Mima goes around the city in
a chase. In both cases, the protagonist is affected by the job, and they
receive threatening messages. Nina sees Whore while Mima receives the fax
calling her a traitor. If one were to delve deeper, one even sees the
similarity in the naming of characters (however this argument is based sole on
conjuncture and lacks credibility.)In both cases there is a clear mirror motif
being followed throughout the film. The portrayal of the doppelganger is
almost similar in both films. Despite this there is an immense similarity
between the story line and the character sketches. Due to the overbearing
nature of the similarity I find it hard to accept that Black Swan is not
influenced by Perfect Blue. The inspiration may not have been intentional;
however, the similarity is too much to be dismissed as coincidence. In this
light such an undeniable similarity between the two films disqualifies Darren
Aronofsky from being recognized as an auteur for this film.Black Swan
also draws heavily on what is called the Doppelganger effect and the split
personality. These woven into a maze of mirror motif is the central theme
throughout the film. This
is a strategy which is well-known in classical Hollywood cinema such as
precisely ‘The Red Shoes’. This
being said this film has Aronofsky’s stamp all over it.
There is a great similarity between the characters ‘The Ram’
and ‘Nina Sayers’. In his own words…“They are both artists who use their
bodyAge threatens themPhysical injury threatens themThey only have their hands
to express themselves.”
In all of his films, the sets have a sense of belonging. The
props used are bare minimum. Only those strictly necessary are used. His set
design is simple precise yet he somehow manages to bring a sense of belonging,
a nativity to his sets. For example in the Black Swan recital, the set was
simple, yet it somehow added to the elegance and grandeur bringing with it a
certain ethereal quality with it.Another notable trait in his films is his music. Black
Swan marks the fifth consecutive collaboration between Aronofsky and Clint
Mansell. In all his films, music is exploited as a medium to dramatize the
situation. The editing is also pertinent to the music. This relationship
between the editing and BG score is most successfully exploited in Requiem for
a Dream which gained acclaim for its hip-hop style editing.His attention to detail is yet another endearing
stamp. For example, in the opening scene of Black Swan, the change in the tutu
indicating the change in emotion is subtle almost not noticeable, yet one feels
the emotion without really seeing it. The small stiff (classical pancake) tutu,
for the innocent cheery bit, the long flowing (romantic) tutu for poised
elegance and a graceful waltz, and, the shorter (platter) tutu, for the
transition into Black Swan. Also if one were to notice keenly, one would see
that almost every scene of Nina alone in the film will also include a mirror
reflecting Nina in some angle. Aronofsky has made great use of this to exploit
the two mindedness of Nina’s psychosis. In all respects of style, editing and
misé-ene-scene Aronofsky has distinctly made his mark on all five films.In an
interview, Aronofsky, says he was deeply influenced by the roller coaster
Cyclone, and that he has adopted that intense structure, which keeps the audience
on the edge, in his films. He aims to thrill the audience and amuse them with
his films, almost like a roller coaster on the loose. This, he certainly has achieved
in his films.

.jpg)
Comments